I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I
get is this:
[mhr at mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update
Password:
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* base: linux.mirrors.es.net
* updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com
* extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net
kbs-CentOS-Extras | 951 B 00:00
base | 1.1 kB 00:00
updates | 951 B 00:00
extras | 1.1 kB 00:00
0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Update Process
No Packages marked for Update
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/mhr
[mhr at mhrichter ~]$ yg dnsmasq
dnsmasq.x86_64 2.45-1.el5_2.1 installed
According to the announcement (see below), the lastest version is this:
9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or
is there something else?
mhr
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <centos-announce-request at centos.org>
Date: Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:00 AM
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
? ? ? ?centos-announce at centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
? ? ? ?http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
? ? ? ?centos-announce-request at centos.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
? ? ? ?centos-announce-owner at centos.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CentOS-announce digest..."
Today's Topics:
? 1. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386 dnsmasq ? ?Update
? ? ?(Karanbir Singh)
? 2. CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 dnsmasq ?Update
? ? ?(Karanbir Singh)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:22 +0000
From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386
? ? ? ?dnsmasq Update
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Message-ID: <20090901151022.GA10326 at tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
i386:
15068053a0aeea31232c06e17b88d2e7 ?dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm
Source:
88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 ?dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:10:23 +0000
From: Karanbir Singh <kbsingh at centos.org>
Subject: [CentOS-announce] CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64
? ? ? ?dnsmasq Update
To: centos-announce at centos.org
Message-ID: <20090901151023.GA10341 at tantra.karan.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2009:1238 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-1238.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename )
x86_64:
9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec ?dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
88bd7bb7252fd9f2ba5fdbdb09b57d95 ?dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.src.rpm
--
Karanbir Singh
CentOS Project { http://www.centos.org/ }
irc: z00dax, #centos at irc.freenode.net
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
CentOS-announce mailing list
CentOS-announce at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
End of CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
**********************************************
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS at centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 3:05 PM, MHR<mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote:> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this: > > [mhr at mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update > Password: > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > ?* base: linux.mirrors.es.net > ?* updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com > ?* extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net > kbs-CentOS-Extras ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ?951 B ? ? 00:00 > base ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 1.1 kB ? ? 00:00 > updates ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ?951 B ? ? 00:00 > extras ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | 1.1 kB ? ? 00:00 > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protectionsMark: Verify that your priorities plugin is configured properly. Lanny http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities
Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 16:05, MHR<mhullrich at gmail.com> wrote:> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this: > > [mhr at mhrichter ~]$ yg dnsmasq > dnsmasq.x86_64 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? 2.45-1.el5_2.1 ? ? ? ? ? ? ?installed > > According to the announcement (see below), the lastest version is this: > 9ee6bf903671f38806a119874ec74eec ?dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.x86_64.rpm > > What's up here? ?Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or > is there something else?Is it maybe because 2.45-1.1.el5_3 < 2.45-1.el5_2.1 ??? Since '1' < 'e' ? I tried to confirm this, but did not find any tool to which I could give two RPM versions and it would tell me which one was higher... Do you know of any such tool/script? Cheers, Filipe
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote:> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I > get is this:< trim your reply to the mailing list!, don't send us the daily digest >> > [mhr at mhrichter ~]$ sudo yum update > Password: > Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities > Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile > * base: linux.mirrors.es.net > * updates: centos.g5selfstorage.com > * extras: centos.mirrors.redwire.net > kbs-CentOS-Extras | 951 B 00:00 > base | 1.1 kB 00:00 > updates | 951 B 00:00 > extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 > 0 packages excluded due to repository priority protections > Setting up Update Process > No Packages marked for Updateworks for me: ... Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution Dependencies Resolved ===================================================================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size =====================================================================================================================Updating: dnsmasq i386 2.45-1.1.el5_3 updates 165 k Transaction Summary =====================================================================================================================Install 0 Package(s) Update 1 Package(s) Remove 0 Package(s) Total download size: 165 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: dnsmasq-2.45-1.1.el5_3.i386.rpm | 165 kB 00:00 Running rpm_check_debug Running Transaction Test Finished Transaction Test Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Updating : dnsmasq [1/2] Cleanup : dnsmasq [2/2] Updated: dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 Complete! Try the usual 'yum clean all' and retry.... Tru -- Tru Huynh (mirrors, CentOS-3 i386/x86_64 Package Maintenance) http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xBEFA581B -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090902/a0d2f341/attachment-0001.sig>
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Tru Huynh<tru at centos.org> wrote:> > works for me: >I'm so excited!> Try the usual 'yum clean all' and retry.... >That was my first resort - no help. mhr
Hi, On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 17:29, Tru Huynh<tru at centos.org> wrote:> On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:05:50PM -0700, MHR wrote: >> I have attempted to update with yum over the last 27 hours, and all I >> get is this: > > > works for me: > > ... > Setting up Update Process > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package dnsmasq.i386 0:2.45-1.1.el5_3 set to be updated > --> Finished Dependency ResolutionFor me it does not work either: # rpm -q dnsmasq dnsmasq-2.45-1.el5_2.1 # yum clean all Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Cleaning up Everything Cleaning up list of fastest mirrors # yum update dnsmasq Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Determining fastest mirrors base | 1.1 kB 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 878 kB 00:00 base 2508/2508 updates | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 317 kB 00:00 updates 478/478 addons | 951 B 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 157 B 00:00 extras | 1.1 kB 00:00 primary.xml.gz | 107 kB 00:00 extras 324/324 Setting up Update Process No Packages marked for Update It seems like my mirror has outdated repodata, see http://centos.mirror.iweb.ca/5/updates/i386/repodata/, the files are dated 26-Aug-2009, I checked http://mirror.centos.org/ and the files are dated 02-Sep-2009 there... Do you have any scripts to check the date of the files in all mirrors and see which of them are outdated? Thanks! Filipe
MHR wrote: <snip>> > What's up here? Is this really a case of incredibly slow mirrors or > is there something else? > > mhr >Same here, kind of. My rsync script pulled the package from my local (UK) mirror yesterday shortly after it's release was announced, but the metadata has yet to be refreshed (still dated 26/8/2009) so yum won't pick up the update until that happens.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 x86_64 dnsmasq Update
- CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 55, Issue 1
- CESA-2009:1238 Important CentOS 5 i386 dnsmasq Update
- Any known problems with kernel-2.6.18-164.el5.x86_64 / x86_64 / 3ware?
- CentOS-announce before mirrors ready?