asterisk users - Dec 2008 - top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was it top posting?

Thanks for that, it IS appreciated - but, everyone, can we please not argue this
matter any more.  Some see it as top posting - some don't. I really
don't care either way.

No if we could just get back to the subject in hand and not clog up this list
with flames.

Thanks
Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces
at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Mr Gabriel
Sent: 05 December 2008 14:05
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design] - Or was
it top posting?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Mr Gabriel" <gabriel at fusis.com>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:58:09 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: ?CDR Design]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew Thomas" <andy at datavox.co.uk>
To: "Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion"
<asterisk-users at lists.digium.com>
Sent: Friday, 5 December, 2008 13:49:59 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: ?CDR Design]

Address added to spam filter. ?Please do NOT e-mail me again.

-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com
[mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Tzafrir
Cohen
Sent: 05 December 2008 13:27
To: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com
Subject: [asterisk-users] top posting again [was: Re: CDR Design]

Top posting strikes again:

On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 01:39:59PM +0200, regs at kinetix.gr
wrote:
> Quote : "Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't 
> reliable enough for a billing platform (as you've 
> rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic call
> logging (something the customer can look at)."
Who wrote that?

[snip the rest of the reply]
> Andrew Thomas wrote:
[snip]
> >Like I said earlier - the CDR's aren't reliable enough for a
billing
> >platform (as you've rightly pointed out) but are OK for very basic
call
> >logging (something the customer can look at).
Why didn't you place your reply here?

We have archives of the list. We can spot the original message.

[snip more useless quoting resulted from top-posting]

** SNIP **

Which address did you add to the spam filter? Was in the asterisk address? If
you don't want to recieve any more mails from the list, then you should
unregister, not add it to the spam list :)

** SNIP **


I don't think this one was a TOP POST.... read the whole message!